Current:Home > MyProposed TikTok ban for kids fails in Virginia’s Legislature -Wealth Evolution Experts
Proposed TikTok ban for kids fails in Virginia’s Legislature
View
Date:2025-04-26 10:58:03
RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — A GOP legislative effort to prevent Virginia children from using the popular video-sharing app TikTok — an idea backed by Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin — died this week in the Democratic-controlled Legislature.
The bill, sponsored by Republican Del. Jay Leftwich of Chesapeake, was left in a House of Delegates committee after concerns were raised about how the ban would be enforced. Lawmakers also questioned whether singling out just one company was the right approach at a time of broad and rising concern from parents and lawmakers about the effect of social media on youth.
The bill’s lack of movement effectively killed the measure because of a procedural deadline Tuesday for most legislation to clear its chamber of origin. No comparable bill was introduced in the state Senate.
Youngkin framed his call for a ban on kids using the app, issued in a December speech, as a tool to help protect children’s mental health, part of a broader push by his administration on the issue.
Leftwich also said he brought the bill out of mental health and data privacy concerns for young people.
“The whole platform, especially for minors, is to get them engaged and kind of hooked into watching these things. And it leads them down different rabbit holes and they sit there for hours and hours watching these things,” he said in a committee hearing.
Leftwich’s bill went through a hefty revision from the way it was first introduced. The most recent iteration said TikTok Inc. and ByteDance, the Chinese company that owns the app, “shall not provide access to TikTok to any child within the Commonwealth.”
The bill would have allowed a child’s parent or legal custodian to bring a lawsuit against TikTok if a child was provided access. And if a plaintiff prevailed, they could recover damages of $75,000 for “each discrete violation,” defined as each separate instance a child accessed the platform, along with other damages, according to the text of the bill.
The bill received one hearing in a House committee that deals with technology bills. It advanced from there on a bipartisan 14-8 vote to a different committee where it was never heard.
Democrats in the hearing raised a range of concerns, including questions about enforceability and whether the government — rather than parents — should be responsible for limiting children’s access to social media.
Leftwich responded that policymakers have banned children from having access to “harmful substances” like alcohol and cannabis, and that he saw his proposal in the same light.
Del. Holly Seibold, a Democrat from Fairfax County, thanked Leftwich for brining the bill, saying she was a parent of teenagers and agreed children are becoming addicted to social media apps and their cellphones in general.
“But I will not be supporting this bill because I think it’s unfair to single out TikTok,” she said.
A spokesperson for TikTok, Jamal Brown, said in a statement that the company works hard to support teens’ well-being on the app, with tools including an automatic 60-minute time limit for users under 18, restrictions on direct messaging and parental controls.
“We’ve long said bans, like the one proposed in this legislation, are not only the wrong approach, but also raise significant First Amendment concerns,” Brown said.
Macaulay Porter, deputy communications director for Youngkin, said in a statement that the governor “remains committed to empowering parents in Virginia and protecting youth in the Commonwealth from social media’s harmful impacts.”
Youngkin previously banned the use of TikTok on state government devices and wireless networks through a 2022 executive order, citing national security concerns.
Other states and the federal government have taken similar steps to limit the use of the app on government devices, and Montana in 2023 passed a complete ban, which was later put on hold before it could take effect by a federal judge who called it unconstitutional.
veryGood! (42)
Related
- Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
- Mystery American Idol Contestant Who Dropped Out of 2023 Competition Revealed
- Aaron Carter's Cause of Death Revealed
- Travis Barker’s Birthday Message to Kourtney Kardashian Celebrates All the Small Things—and PDA
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- How electric vehicles got their juice
- This On-Sale Amazon Dress With 17,000+ 5-Star Reviews Is the Spring Look of Your Dreams
- Hailey Bieber Recalls Facing Saddest, Hardest Moments in Her Life Since Start of 2023
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- This is what's at risk from climate change in Alaska
Ranking
- Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
- Taurus Shoppable Horoscope: 11 Birthday Gifts Every Stylish, Stubborn & Sleepy Taurus Will Love
- Travis Barker’s Birthday Message to Kourtney Kardashian Celebrates All the Small Things—and PDA
- Interest In Electric Vehicles Is Growing, And So Is The Demand For Lithium
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- COP27 climate talks start in Egypt, as delegates arrive from around the world
- A proposed lithium mine presents a climate versus environment conflict
- Climate change makes storms like Ian more common
Recommendation
Bodycam footage shows high
Why Women Everywhere Love Ashley Tisdale's Being Frenshe Beauty, Wellness & Home Goods
Traditional Plant Knowledge Is Not A Quick Fix
Climate Change Stresses Out These Chipmunks. Why Are Their Cousins So Chill?
Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
What a lettuce farm in Senegal reveals about climate-driven migration in Africa
Why Frank Ocean's Eyebrow-Raising Coachella 2023 Performance Was Cut Short
Canadian military to help clean up Fiona's devastation